Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Industrial Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Deery, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Mahony, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Temporal Flexibility: Management Strategies and Employee Preferences in the Retail Industry

Stephen J. Deery

Department of Management and Industrial Relations, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3052

Andrea Mahony

Department of Management and Industrial Relations, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3052

The introduction of more flexible working time arrangements has become an important managerial objective in Australia. This is particularly the case in the retail services sector where management has sought to obtain greater freedom to match staffing levels more closely to fluctuations in the volume of customer demand. Such arrangements may not, however, be in accordance with employee preferences. The aim of this paper is to examine the issue of temporal flexibility by looking at the employment policies of a large retailing firm as well as the attitudes of its employees to the introduction of flexible working hours. Contradictions are identified in the company's labour utilization strategy, which have attendant costs for both the employees and the organization.

Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 36, No. 3, 332-352 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/002218569403600302


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Asia Pacific Journal of Human ResourcesHome page
D. Lowry
The casual management of casual work: Casual workers' perceptions of HRM practices in the highly casualised firm
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, January 1, 2001; 39(1): 42 - 62.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JIRHome page
D. Buttigieg and J. Walsh
How Do Women Fare in Internal Labour Markets? Evidence from the Australian and British Banking Industries
Journal of Industrial Relations, January 1, 2000; 42(3): 345 - 363.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JIRHome page
I. Campbell
Casual Employment, Labour Regulation and Australian Trade Unions
Journal of Industrial Relations, January 1, 1996; 38(4): 571 - 599.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JIRHome page
M. Wooden
Penalty Rates and Labour Supply
Journal of Industrial Relations, January 1, 1995; 37(2): 297 - 301.
[PDF]


Home page
JIRHome page
S. J. Deery and A. Mahony
Penalty Rates and Labour Supply: A Reply
Journal of Industrial Relations, January 1, 1995; 37(2): 302 - 305.
[PDF]