Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Industrial Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, A.
Right arrow Articles by Fieldes, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

'Monday I'Ve Got Friday On My Mind': Working Time in the Hospitality Industry

Alison Barnes

School of Industrial Relations and Organisational Behaviour, University of New South Wales

Diane Fieldes

School of Industrial Relations and Organisational Behaviour, University of New South Wales

It is commonly argued that the drive towards flexible working hours is an important arena in which the interests of employers and workers can be reconciled to mutual benefit through workplace bargaining. Against this, others suggest that the potential for mutual gain is illusory, that the needs of workers and employers are conflictual, and that this conflict occurs as much in the field of working hours as it does over wages. In this article we set up the broad argument and then provide a case study that analyses the debate over working time reorganisation in the Australian hospitality industry in the late 1990s. We focus particularly on the hospitality award simplification decision of 1997 and the penalty rates decision of 1998. The arguments in the Australian Industrial Relations Commission, the various responses to the decision, and subsequent developments in the industry all illustrate conflicting interests between employers and employees on the question of working time.

Current preoccupations with working time include the capacity of flexible working hours to reconcile the needs and desires of workers and employers. Counterposed to this view are arguments that highlight the disparity between the rhetoric of hours flexibility and the reality as experienced by Australian workers, particularly women.

Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 42, No. 4, 535-550 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/002218560004200404


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JIRHome page
D. Weil
Rethinking the Regulation of Vulnerable Work in the USA: A Sector-based Approach
Journal of Industrial Relations, June 1, 2009; 51(3): 411 - 430.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JIRHome page
A. Knox
Better the Devil you Know? An Analysis of Employers' Bargaining Preferences in the Australian Hotel Industry
Journal of Industrial Relations, February 1, 2009; 51(1): 25 - 44.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Asia Pacific Journal of Human ResourcesHome page
A. Knox
Gender desegregation and equal employment opportunity in Australian luxury hotels: Are we there yet?
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, August 1, 2008; 46(2): 153 - 172.
[Abstract] [PDF]