Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Industrial Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, R.
Right arrow Articles by Korman, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

What's Going on with the ‘No Disadvantage Test’? An Analysis of Outcomes and Processes Under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (CWLTH)

Richard Mitchell

Centre for Employment and Labour Relations Law, Melbourne Law School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic. 3010, Australiar.mitchell{at}unimelb.edu.au

Rebecca Campbell

Andrew Barnes

Emma Bicknell

Kate Creighton

Joel Fetter

Samantha Korman

Centre for Employment and Labour Relations Law, Melbourne Law School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic. 3010, Australia

This article examines the operation of the ‘no disadvantage test’ (NDT) as it applies to the approval or certification of certain forms of agreements under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cwlth). The purpose is to make an assessment of the effectiveness of the test in meeting the supposed statutory intention that workers would not be made worse-off as a result of entering into agreements which derogated from award and other legally prescribed conditions of employment. The article reports on research which applied the NDT in detail to 36 agreements, and, more partially, to a further 48 agreements. The general conclusion arrived at, though heavily qualified, was that in certain defined respects, the NDT, as presently constructed and applied, is failing adequately to protect employees from a deterioration in their terms and conditions of employment.

Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 47, No. 4, 393-423 (2005)
DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-9296.2005.00182.x


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of SociologyHome page
Y. van Gellecum, J. Baxter, and M. Western
Neoliberalism, gender inequality and the Australian labour market
Journal of Sociology, March 1, 2008; 44(1): 45 - 63.
[Abstract] [PDF]