This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Folkman, P. Articles by Johal, S. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Private Equity: Levered on Capital or Labour?

CRESC, University of Manchester

Julie Froud

CRESC, University of Manchester, julie.froud{at}manchester.ac.uk

Karel Williams

CRESC, University of Manchester

Sukhdev Johal

Royal Holloway, University of London

This article argues that, during the 2002—7 conjuncture, private equity was levered on capital, not labour. During this period of rapid up-scaling the sources of the gains were variable and included financial engineering and windfall trading gains. In general terms, the favourable conditions of cheap and available debt meant that restructuring at the expense of employment conditions was not a necessary, or even important, part of all private equity deals. The first half of the article reviews the narrative and numbers on the employment effects of private equity, highlighting the counter claims of different narrative positions and the heterogeneous nature of the evidence. The second part of the article presents an alternative view of private equity, arguing that the change in conjuncture after the credit crunch that began in 2007 will mean that different sources of gain become more important.

Key Words: conjuncture • financial intermediaries • leverage • narrative and numbers • private equity

Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 51, No. 4, 517-527 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0022185609339516


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?