This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Beggs, J. J. Articles by Chapman, B. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Australian Strike Activity in an International Context: 1964-85

Bruce J. Chapman

Department of Statistics, The Faculties and Centre for Economic Policy Research, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University, GPO Box 4, Canberra, ACT 2601

The relative level of strike activity delivered by the Australian industrial relations system is central to current debate. The most simple method of addressing this issue is to make international comparisons of average working days lost per employee from industrial disputation. This paper reports these data for fourteen OECD countries for 1964-85. Simple comparison of strikes is far from an ideal method for judging the relative efficacy of countries' industrial relations systems, for two main reasons. The first is that different criteria are used across countries for inclusion or collection of strike data. Australian statistics are relatively comprehensive, implying that some part of Australia's relatively high level of strike activity is attributable to measurement. Second, macroeconomic variables influence the incidence and duration of strikes. This simple observation renders suspect the use of international comparisons of these disputes data as reflections only of industrial relations systems, since differences in macroeconomic experience will manifest themselves, to some extent, in these data. Through control for inflation and unemployment, among other things, a more accurate assessment of the Australian industrial relations system in an international context is made possible. The Australian system apparently delivers lower, or about the same, strike activity as culturally and politically similar countries. Overall there is no reason to believe that Australia is markedly different from the international norm.

Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 29, No. 2, 137-149 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/002218568702900201


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Peetz Nearly the Year of Living Dangerously: In the Emerging Worlds of Australian Industrial Relations Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, January 1, 1999; 37(2): 3 - 23. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Gahan Did Arbitration Make for Dependent Unionism? Evidence from Historical Case Studies Journal of Industrial Relations, January 1, 1996; 38(4): 648 - 698. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. O'Brien McKinsey, Hilmer and the BCA: The 'New Management' Model of Labour Market Reform Journal of Industrial Relations, January 1, 1994; 36(4): 468 - 490. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. D. Lansbury and M. Westcott Researching Australian Industrial Relations: Dawn or Twilight of a Golden Age? Journal of Industrial Relations, January 1, 1992; 34(3): 396 - 419. [PDF]

				P. E.T. Lewis and D. J. Spiers Six Years of the Accord: An Assessment Journal of Industrial Relations, January 1, 1990; 32(1): 53 - 68. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. J. Beggs and B. J. Chapman Australian Strike Activity in An International Context, 1964-85: Rejoinder Journal of Industrial Relations, January 1, 1988; 30(2): 318 - 320. [PDF]