Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Industrial Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frenkel, S.
Right arrow Articles by Peetz, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Enterprise Bargaining: The BCA's Report on Industrial Relations Reform

Stephen Frenkel

David Peetz

School of Industrial Relations and Organizational Behaviour, University of New South Wales, PO Box I, Kensington, NSW 2033

The Business Council of Australia's report on industrial relations argues that the major barrier to the competitiveness of large Australian firms is the centralized system, which hosts a fragmented structure of awards and unions that is out of touch with the requirements of corporate management and inconsistent with employee needs. We examine the various elements of the research underlying the Business Council report and show that the report's conclusions are either not supported by the evidence or greatly overstated. A shift towards unregulated decentralized bargaining, as favoured by the report, would probably yield less benefit than the present direction of reform through the award restructuring process within the context of a centralized framework. We conclude that the report diverts attention from the many factors that will determine the future competitiveness of Australian firms and that it serves as a warning about the limitations of sponsored research.

Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 32, No. 1, 69-99 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/002218569003200105


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Asia Pacific Journal of Human ResourcesHome page
D. E. Morgan and I. Hampson
The Management of Organizational Structure and Strategy: The New Professionalism and Management Redemption
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, September 1, 1998; 36(1): 1 - 24.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JIRHome page
I. Hampson and D. E. Morgan
The World According To Karpin: a Critique of Enterprising Nation
Journal of Industrial Relations, January 1, 1997; 39(4): 457 - 477.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JIRHome page
J. O'Brien
McKinsey, Hilmer and the BCA: The 'New Management' Model of Labour Market Reform
Journal of Industrial Relations, January 1, 1994; 36(4): 468 - 490.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JIRHome page
G. Zappala
The Closed Shop in Australia
Journal of Industrial Relations, January 1, 1992; 34(1): 3 - 30.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JIRHome page
R. D. Lansbury and M. Westcott
Researching Australian Industrial Relations: Dawn or Twilight of a Golden Age?
Journal of Industrial Relations, January 1, 1992; 34(3): 396 - 419.
[PDF]


Home page
JIRHome page
R. Drago and M. Wooden
Turnover Down Under: Trade Unions and Exit Behaviour in Australia
Journal of Industrial Relations, January 1, 1991; 33(2): 234 - 248.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JIRHome page
R. Drago and M. Wooden
The BCA Report: A Response to Frenkel and Peetz (II)
Journal of Industrial Relations, January 1, 1990; 32(3): 413 - 418.
[PDF]


Home page
JIRHome page
P. Boxall
Towards the Wagner Framework: Change in New Zealand Industrial Relations
Journal of Industrial Relations, January 1, 1990; 32(4): 523 - 543.
[Abstract] [PDF]