|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Enterprise Bargaining: The BCA's Report on Industrial Relations Reform
Stephen Frenkel
David Peetz
School of Industrial Relations and Organizational Behaviour, University of New South Wales, PO Box I, Kensington, NSW 2033
The Business Council of Australia's report on industrial relations argues that the major barrier to the competitiveness of large Australian firms is the centralized system, which hosts a fragmented structure of awards and unions that is out of touch with the requirements of corporate management and inconsistent with employee needs. We examine the various elements of the research underlying the Business Council report and show that the report's conclusions are either not supported by the evidence or greatly overstated. A shift towards unregulated decentralized bargaining, as favoured by the report, would probably yield less benefit than the present direction of reform through the award restructuring process within the context of a centralized framework. We conclude that the report diverts attention from the many factors that will determine the future competitiveness of Australian firms and that it serves as a warning about the limitations of sponsored research.
Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 32, No. 1,
69-99 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/002218569003200105

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. E. Morgan and I. Hampson
The Management of Organizational Structure and Strategy: The New Professionalism and Management Redemption
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources,
September 1, 1998;
36(1):
1 - 24.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Hampson and D. E. Morgan
The World According To Karpin: a Critique of Enterprising Nation
Journal of Industrial Relations,
January 1, 1997;
39(4):
457 - 477.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. O'Brien
McKinsey, Hilmer and the BCA: The 'New Management' Model of Labour Market Reform
Journal of Industrial Relations,
January 1, 1994;
36(4):
468 - 490.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Zappala
The Closed Shop in Australia
Journal of Industrial Relations,
January 1, 1992;
34(1):
3 - 30.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. D. Lansbury and M. Westcott
Researching Australian Industrial Relations: Dawn or Twilight of a Golden Age?
Journal of Industrial Relations,
January 1, 1992;
34(3):
396 - 419.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Drago and M. Wooden
Turnover Down Under: Trade Unions and Exit Behaviour in Australia
Journal of Industrial Relations,
January 1, 1991;
33(2):
234 - 248.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Drago and M. Wooden
The BCA Report: A Response to Frenkel and Peetz (II)
Journal of Industrial Relations,
January 1, 1990;
32(3):
413 - 418.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Boxall
Towards the Wagner Framework: Change in New Zealand Industrial Relations
Journal of Industrial Relations,
January 1, 1990;
32(4):
523 - 543.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|